Politics, Technology, and Language

If thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought — George Orwell

Condoms, hypocrisy, and the Big Bang theory

Posted by metaphorical on 18 June 2007

“We always find it funny that you can use sex to sell jewelry and cars, but you can’t use sex to sell condoms,”
— Carol Carrozza, vice president of marketing for Ansell Healthcare, which makes LifeStyles condoms.

Fox and CBS have reached new heights or depths of hypocrisy in rejecting a commercial for Trojan condoms that the company will start running tonight on some tv networks that haven’t yet entirely lost their senses.

The NY Times reports today that the two networks refused to comment, but “in a written response to Trojan,”

Fox said that it had rejected the spot because, “Contraceptive advertising must stress health-related uses rather than the prevention of pregnancy.”

Does this image look like that of a network that thinks sex is only for procreation?


How about this “exclusive” first interview last year with the 2006 Playmate of the Year?


After first pretending this was a serious business story, the network swapped out the image of interviewer Neil Cavuto for B roll of the playmate, Kara Monaco, in a bustier, dancing as if she popped out of a wedding cake, and provocatively straddling a motorcycle. This is, after all, the network of Beverly Hills 90210 and Married… With Children.


Meanwhile CBS, the so-called Tiffany network, has always had a prudish streak, but that hasn’t kept it from running shows laden with sexual tension, from Dallas to Murphy Brown to Survivor. In fact, according to Slate, CBS’s best chance of a hit this fall is a show named “The Big Bang Theory.”

the show is sort of Beauty and the Geek meets Three’s Company, with the same jiggle-and-giggle tone of Two and a Half Men: Two nerdy geniuses with a hot babe across the hall.

As the Times reports,

In its rejection, CBS wrote, “while we understand and appreciate the humor of this creative, we do not find it appropriate for our network even with late-night-only restrictions.”

Yet it also noted that “Networks accept ads of a not-so-subtle sexual nature for erectile dysfunction drugs like Viagra, often restricting them to the wee hours.”

“It’s so hypocritical for any network in this culture to go all puritanical on the subject of condom use when their programming is so salacious,” said Mark Crispin Miller, a media critic who teaches at New York University. “I mean, let’s get real here. Fox and CBS and all of them are in the business of nonstop soft porn, but God forbid we should use a condom in the pursuit of sexual pleasure.”

The Times article doesn’t describe the two networks’ motivations, except briefly:

A 2001 report about condom advertising by the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation found that, “Some networks draw a strong line between messages about disease prevention — which may be allowed — and those about pregnancy prevention, which may be considered controversial for religious and moral reasons.”

In other words, Fox and CBS are afraid of a reaction on the part of the religious right. The problem, though, lies not just with the two networks; blame has to be shared by the rest of us. There’s a clear possibility of a penalty to showing the ad—general complaints about what Crispin called the business of nonstop soft porn might erupt into specific protests and boycotts.

There’s no penalty, except the small loss of revenue, to not showing them. By failing to penalize the networks, we make it easy for the crazies to have their way, and so they do, all too often.


3 Responses to “Condoms, hypocrisy, and the Big Bang theory”

  1. Swanny said

    These aren’t the Trojan Games commericals are they?

  2. digglahhh said

    This is just about par for the course. The first E.D. ads did get their share of flack from the religious zealots too, if I remember correctly. I assume they’d get over it.

    I hope when the NFL officials meet this offseason, they go over the tape of last year’s Lingerie Bowl so they can rethink their inexplicable interpretation of the “tuck rule” (insert man in woman’s panties joke here).

    Seriously, the halftime stuff is hilarious. The only thing that made me happy about the whole Janet Jackson titty fiasco was that the network’s pandering to non-football fans blew up in it’s face. It is because the networks pander to “this women hate sports so we have to give them pop music” shit, that other networks overcompensate and seek to lure the single male audience away from the terrible halftime show with T & A. But, at any good party, you know that the first round starts at noon, and halftime is when the championship game of the beer pong tournament is played.

    BTW, 90210 and Married… With Children were both damn good shows. Grandmaster B wouldn’t tell me to turn down my radio.

    Donna Martin Graduates!

  3. Swanny said

    But Al would show up with the bat, if he didn’t get sidetracked by the neon lights of the nudie bar. It’s the Murdertown, USA, ethos.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: