White men can’t jump, but maybe they don’t have to
Posted by digglahhh on 5 May 2007
The New York times reports on a paper written by Justin Wolfers and Joseph Price, a University of Pennsylvania assistant professor and a Cornell graduate student, respectively. The paper has yet to be published or peer reviewed. It claims that, in the NBA, white referees call fouls on black players at a higher rate than they do against white players. It also notes a reciprocal but weaker relationship between black officials and white players. The study covers thirteen seasons worth of data and attempts to control for an inordinate amount of variables, including just about all of the ones that first popped into my head when thinking about potential problems with such a study.
The idea of implicit racial associations playing a role in how we view sports and athletes is not only not new to me, I’ve been arguing on this behalf for years. I was recently involved in not one, but two, on-line discussions started by fellows who believe that modern baseball players who wear baggy uniform pants and/or slightly tilted caps disrespect the game with their “sloppiness” and “unprofessional” appearance. Beyond the notion that “professionalism” is a social construct, I was struck by the historical ignorance these statements. (This was a forum for baseball junkies, after all.)
See, baseball heroes of yesteryear wore baggy pants and tilted hats. The Hall of Fame is full of them. Many of the actual plaques of old-time Hall of Famers even depict the player wearing a crooked hat. Oh yeah, old time ballplayers were white.
One of the members dryly noted, after a series of photos of old time players in baggy pants and cocked caps:
“You also have to remember that the players back then were white so it was okay. Nowadays minority athletes are doing it so it is bad.”
The concept of implicit racial association is simple; you are subconsciously conditioned to associate positive characteristics with light skin and negative characteristics with dark skin. This is not an indictment of the person who makes such an association as a racist; but simply a statement of race’s place in how we are conditioned to think. Still, in knee-jerk fashion, people categorically deny that race informs their decisions and opinions.
The NBA’s reaction to these allegations didn’t really surprise me. It claims no racial bias in its officiating, and it claims it has done its own studies to support their claim. Maybe the NBA is right, but their officials are social beings like the rest of us. To be sure, more than a few league officials and players deny the phenomenon, but a conscious denial of a subconscious relationship is just what you’d expect. Notably, two black coaches declined to comment.
A racial bias could have real implications in terms of game outcomes. Wolfers notes:
…for each additional black starter a team had, relative to its opponent, a team’s chance of winning would decline from a theoretical 50 percent to 49 percent and so on… the team with the greater share of playing time by black players during those 13 years won 48.6 percent of games – a difference of about two victories in an 82 game season
“Basically it suggests that if you spray paint one of your starters white, you’d win a few more games.”
How’s that for spinning a stereotype on its head!
Assumptions about race’s relation to intelligence manifest themselves in all areas of sports, from hiring practices to sports journalism. The stereotype of black athletes being of substandard intelligence may (or may not) have subsided, but minorities certainly aren’t represented as executives and coaches in proportion to their representation on the field of play, in any sport. The bluntest of these assertions, like blacks not being smart enough to be quarterbacks seem to have subsided, however, new, more subtle standards have emerged to take their place.
Black quarterbacks are expected to be highly mobile; to be able to run with the ball as well as throw it. Byron Leftwich, QB of the Jacksonville Jaguars has been criticized for not being fast enough and for being too unwilling to run. Flat footed, pocket-passing white quarterbacks receive no such criticism. Speed and mobility are not seen as essential skills for white QBs.
Many of the implicit associations involving race and athletics are apparent in the way athletes’ attributes are described. Successful black athletes are often referred to as “athletic” and “naturally gifted,” while successful white athletes are often referred to as “hardworking” and “committed.” The hardworking white athlete hones his skills with hours of preparation and study, while the lazy, simian black athlete reaps the benefits of his natural strength, size and speed. — this is the unrefined version of the racist belief these linguistic tendencies are based on.
What does it even mean to call a player hard working or athletic in the context of preparing for and playing at the highest level of competition in the world? They’re all athletic and hard working – that’s kinda why they get paid millions to play these sports and we sit on the couch and marvel at them.
In baseball, smaller white players who run hard, hustle, and are willing to sacrifice their physical wellbeing for the good of the team are often called “gamers,” “grinders,” “lunch pail guys” or “blue collar guys.” Listen to what Kenny Williams (a rare, black) GM of the Chicago White Sox had to say about his lunch pail guys, on the occasion of signing Darin Erstad, this off season. Erstad is a career below-average player who had one fluke season in 2000 when he was incredibly productive and a key member of the World Series champion Angels.
Aaron Rowand gave us an edge two years ago,” general manager Kenny Williams said. “That grinder effect, if you will. We missed it last year. I’ve always thought that Aaron Rowand and Darin Erstad were the poster children for that style of play.”
Trust me, Aaron Rowand and Darin Erstad are not what World Series rings are made out of.
Minorities who play with passion and hustle are often called “electric,” “fiery” and referred to a “sparkplugs.” Sometimes, even two of those words at a time.
New York Mets related blog run amok with sentences like this:
Lastings Milledge– Look for the rookie phenom to bring a spark to the Mets with his fiery attitude and electric speed.
(In the interest of full disclosure, and shameless plugging, I would like to acknowledge that firejoemorgan.com has discussed these issues in the past, and my knowing that allowed me to steal several links they had to articles documenting this language. If you are into sports, language, and the breaking down of meaningless platitudes, you’ll love FJM.)
Socrates stated that the only thing he knew was that he knew nothing. As research about the complexities of the human mind progresses, we begin to fathom the multiform processes of our minds, the various levels cognition, the pathways of associations implicit, conscious, sensory and so forth. The more intelligent among us understand that admitting that our own though processes are incomprehensibly complex is not a sign of inadequate intelligence. Contrarily, it displays the abilities to think in the abstract, set aside the ego, and to examine the self. These are all behaviors indicative of intellectual maturity.
Those who outright reject the notion that race has something to do with a foul in a basketball game, or one’s perception of what professionalism is, are guilty of two paradoxical offenses. They are guilty of displaying the hubris it takes for one to be so certain about the nature of elaborate cognitive and social processes that have puzzled some of our most prized minds. At the same time they are guilty of underestimating the depths of their own minds and their ability to process observations and draw connections beyond the most superficial levels.
The NBA, like the rest, of us needs to stop engaging in cognitive dissonance. We can’t continue to deny facets of our thoughts and behavior simply because we wish that they were not true. Instead, we must deconstruct and confront our opinions if we ever truly want to claim them as our own.
Race continues to play a huge part in our most mundane thoughts, it influences decisions we don’t believe it can, it shapes guesses we think are random. Perhaps the biggest reason why it continues to hold such power over our language and values is because we deny its ability to hold any at all.